Fix precedence of interval operator
The interval operator has a lower precedence than, for example, binary operations. This was unexpected and incorrectly implemented in the output functions. For now, this is fixed by enclosing intervals in parentheses to avoid misinterpretations. The existing unit tests are adjusted to the updated output format.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ TEST_CASE("[translation] Rules are translated correctly", "[translation]")
|
||||
input << "p(1..5).";
|
||||
anthem::translate("input", input, context);
|
||||
|
||||
CHECK(output.str() == "(V1 in 1..5 -> p(V1))\n");
|
||||
CHECK(output.str() == "(V1 in (1..5) -> p(V1))\n");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
SECTION("simple example 2")
|
||||
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ TEST_CASE("[translation] Rules are translated correctly", "[translation]")
|
||||
input << "p(N) :- N = 1..5.";
|
||||
anthem::translate("input", input, context);
|
||||
|
||||
CHECK(output.str() == "((V1 in U1 and exists X1, X2 (X1 in U1 and X2 in 1..5 and X1 = X2)) -> p(V1))\n");
|
||||
CHECK(output.str() == "((V1 in U1 and exists X1, X2 (X1 in U1 and X2 in (1..5) and X1 = X2)) -> p(V1))\n");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
SECTION("simple example 3")
|
||||
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ TEST_CASE("[translation] Rules are translated correctly", "[translation]")
|
||||
input << "p(N, 1, 2) :- N = 1..5.";
|
||||
anthem::translate("input", input, context);
|
||||
|
||||
CHECK(output.str() == "((V1 in U1 and V2 in 1 and V3 in 2 and exists X1, X2 (X1 in U1 and X2 in 1..5 and X1 = X2)) -> p(V1, V2, V3))\n");
|
||||
CHECK(output.str() == "((V1 in U1 and V2 in 1 and V3 in 2 and exists X1, X2 (X1 in U1 and X2 in (1..5) and X1 = X2)) -> p(V1, V2, V3))\n");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
SECTION("disjunctive head")
|
||||
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ TEST_CASE("[translation] Rules are translated correctly", "[translation]")
|
||||
input << "q(3, N); p(N, 1, 2) :- N = 1..5.";
|
||||
anthem::translate("input", input, context);
|
||||
|
||||
CHECK(output.str() == "((V1 in U1 and V2 in 1 and V3 in 2 and V4 in 3 and V5 in U1 and exists X1, X2 (X1 in U1 and X2 in 1..5 and X1 = X2)) -> (p(V1, V2, V3) or q(V4, V5)))\n");
|
||||
CHECK(output.str() == "((V1 in U1 and V2 in 1 and V3 in 2 and V4 in 3 and V5 in U1 and exists X1, X2 (X1 in U1 and X2 in (1..5) and X1 = X2)) -> (p(V1, V2, V3) or q(V4, V5)))\n");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
SECTION("disjunctive head (alternative syntax)")
|
||||
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ TEST_CASE("[translation] Rules are translated correctly", "[translation]")
|
||||
input << "q(3, N), p(N, 1, 2) :- N = 1..5.";
|
||||
anthem::translate("input", input, context);
|
||||
|
||||
CHECK(output.str() == "((V1 in U1 and V2 in 1 and V3 in 2 and V4 in 3 and V5 in U1 and exists X1, X2 (X1 in U1 and X2 in 1..5 and X1 = X2)) -> (p(V1, V2, V3) or q(V4, V5)))\n");
|
||||
CHECK(output.str() == "((V1 in U1 and V2 in 1 and V3 in 2 and V4 in 3 and V5 in U1 and exists X1, X2 (X1 in U1 and X2 in (1..5) and X1 = X2)) -> (p(V1, V2, V3) or q(V4, V5)))\n");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
SECTION("escaping conflicting variable names")
|
||||
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ TEST_CASE("[translation] Rules are translated correctly", "[translation]")
|
||||
input << ":- not p(I), I = 1..n.";
|
||||
anthem::translate("input", input, context);
|
||||
|
||||
CHECK(output.str() == "((exists X1 (X1 in U1 and not p(X1)) and exists X2, X3 (X2 in U1 and X3 in 1..n and X2 = X3)) -> #false)\n");
|
||||
CHECK(output.str() == "((exists X1 (X1 in U1 and not p(X1)) and exists X2, X3 (X2 in U1 and X3 in (1..n) and X2 = X3)) -> #false)\n");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
SECTION("disjunctive fact (no arguments)")
|
||||
@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ TEST_CASE("[translation] Rules are translated correctly", "[translation]")
|
||||
input << "p(X, 1..10) :- q(X, 6..12).";
|
||||
anthem::translate("input", input, context);
|
||||
|
||||
CHECK(output.str() == "((V1 in U1 and V2 in 1..10 and exists X1, X2 (X1 in U1 and X2 in 6..12 and q(X1, X2))) -> p(V1, V2))\n");
|
||||
CHECK(output.str() == "((V1 in U1 and V2 in (1..10) and exists X1, X2 (X1 in U1 and X2 in (6..12) and q(X1, X2))) -> p(V1, V2))\n");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
SECTION("intervals with variable")
|
||||
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ TEST_CASE("[translation] Rules are translated correctly", "[translation]")
|
||||
input << ":- q(N), 1 = 1..N.";
|
||||
anthem::translate("input", input, context);
|
||||
|
||||
CHECK(output.str() == "((exists X1 (X1 in U1 and q(X1)) and exists X2, X3 (X2 in 1 and X3 in 1..U1 and X2 = X3)) -> #false)\n");
|
||||
CHECK(output.str() == "((exists X1 (X1 in U1 and q(X1)) and exists X2, X3 (X2 in 1 and X3 in (1..U1) and X2 = X3)) -> #false)\n");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
SECTION("intervals with two variables")
|
||||
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ TEST_CASE("[translation] Rules are translated correctly", "[translation]")
|
||||
input << ":- q(M, N), M = 1..N.";
|
||||
anthem::translate("input", input, context);
|
||||
|
||||
CHECK(output.str() == "((exists X1, X2 (X1 in U1 and X2 in U2 and q(X1, X2)) and exists X3, X4 (X3 in U1 and X4 in 1..U2 and X3 = X4)) -> #false)\n");
|
||||
CHECK(output.str() == "((exists X1, X2 (X1 in U1 and X2 in U2 and q(X1, X2)) and exists X3, X4 (X3 in U1 and X4 in (1..U2) and X3 = X4)) -> #false)\n");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
SECTION("comparisons")
|
||||
@@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ TEST_CASE("[translation] Rules are translated correctly", "[translation]")
|
||||
anthem::translate("input", input, context);
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO: eliminate V5: not needed
|
||||
CHECK(output.str() == "((V1 in 1..3 and V2 in U1 and V3 in 2..4 and p(V1, V2)) -> p(V1, V2))\n((V4 in 1..3 and V5 in U2 and V6 in 2..4 and q(V6)) -> q(V6))\n");
|
||||
CHECK(output.str() == "((V1 in (1..3) and V2 in U1 and V3 in (2..4) and p(V1, V2)) -> p(V1, V2))\n((V4 in (1..3) and V5 in U2 and V6 in (2..4) and q(V6)) -> q(V6))\n");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
SECTION("choice rule with body")
|
||||
@@ -302,6 +302,6 @@ TEST_CASE("[translation] Rules are translated correctly", "[translation]")
|
||||
input << "p(N, N ** N) :- N = 1..n.";
|
||||
anthem::translate("input", input, context);
|
||||
|
||||
CHECK(output.str() == "((V1 in U1 and V2 in (U1 ** U1) and exists X1, X2 (X1 in U1 and X2 in 1..n and X1 = X2)) -> p(V1, V2))\n");
|
||||
CHECK(output.str() == "((V1 in U1 and V2 in (U1 ** U1) and exists X1, X2 (X1 in U1 and X2 in (1..n) and X1 = X2)) -> p(V1, V2))\n");
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user