Added unit test for alternative syntax for disjunctive heads.
This commit is contained in:
parent
384cd8677c
commit
25a55a6457
@ -57,6 +57,15 @@ TEST_CASE("[translation] Rules are translated correctly", "[translation]")
|
|||||||
REQUIRE(output.str() == "V1 in N and V2 in 1 and V3 in 2 and V4 in 3 and V5 in N and exists X1, X2 (X1 in N and X2 in (1..5) and X1 = X2) -> p(V1, V2, V3) or q(V4, V5)\n");
|
REQUIRE(output.str() == "V1 in N and V2 in 1 and V3 in 2 and V4 in 3 and V5 in N and exists X1, X2 (X1 in N and X2 in (1..5) and X1 = X2) -> p(V1, V2, V3) or q(V4, V5)\n");
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
SECTION("disjunctive head (alternative syntax)")
|
||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
// TODO: check why order of disjunctive literals is inverted
|
||||||
|
input << "q(3, N), p(N, 1, 2) :- N = 1..5.";
|
||||||
|
anthem::translate("input", input, context);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
REQUIRE(output.str() == "V1 in N and V2 in 1 and V3 in 2 and V4 in 3 and V5 in N and exists X1, X2 (X1 in N and X2 in (1..5) and X1 = X2) -> p(V1, V2, V3) or q(V4, V5)\n");
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
SECTION("escaping conflicting variable names")
|
SECTION("escaping conflicting variable names")
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
input << "p(X1, V1) :- q(X1), q(V1).";
|
input << "p(X1, V1) :- q(X1), q(V1).";
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user