patrick/plasp
Archived
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 12 Releases 8 Activity

Ignore requirements completely #23

New Issue
Open
opened 2017-11-17 15:47:39 +01:00 by patrick · 0 comments
patrick commented 2017-11-17 15:47:39 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

PDDL’s explicitly stated requirements were, arguably, a bad idea, and many competition domains don’t declare them correctly.

Aside from computing requirements implicitly from the set of actually used features (see #7), all errors related to incorrectly declared requirements should be turned into warnings, with the recommendation to leave the requirements section away entirely.

PDDL’s explicitly stated requirements were, arguably, a bad idea, and many competition domains don’t declare them correctly. Aside from computing requirements implicitly from the set of actually used features (see #7), all errors related to incorrectly declared requirements should be turned into warnings, with the recommendation to leave the requirements section away entirely.
patrick added this to the plasp 3.1.1 milestone 2017-11-17 15:47:39 +01:00
patrick self-assigned this 2017-11-17 15:47:39 +01:00
patrick added the
enhancement
 label 2017-11-17 15:47:39 +01:00
patrick modified the milestone from plasp 3.1.1 to plasp 3.1.2 2017-11-26 14:00:51 +01:00
This repo is archived. You cannot comment on issues.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
aesthetic
benchmarks
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
help wanted
invalid
question
suggestion
task
wontfix
No Label
enhancement
Milestone
No items
No Milestone plasp 3.1.2
Assignees
Clear assignees
No Assignees patrick
1 Participants
Due Date
-
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: patrick/plasp#23
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?